2-53th Homework

2016-10-11 · 첨삭 강사 Charry

학생이 쓴 원문

Forcing people to walk, bike or use public-transportation is a good idea on the one side. It could be helpful to reduce the air pollution of the city. When I was a kid, I thought It was a fantastic idea. As I grow up, I find that it is not easy to solve it. First, the city is big and many people live in there. They have to work everyday and they want to live close the office. It's because of the convenience. Everybody wants to conveniently commute. But if the city is big, we have to move a large distance for commuting. I think this idea is good for small city. To be adjusted this idea into the city, a lot of conditions have to be satisfied. I think the conditions are a small city, a good public-transportation system and a good bike road system. Of course, there would be many things. And then, if you are recommended to use something to reduce the air pollution, we could merrily use it or participate in reducing the pollution. To safe the earth, we have to reduce the pollution.

강사 첨삭

Hi, [이름]! ^^ Thank you very much for doing your homework. I loved your sentences and your opinions in relation to this matter. I think air pollution is a very big nowadays. Walking, using bikes and public forms of transportation when commuting would be very helpful in reducing pollution. I think the reason why many people still don\'t want adopt this measures is because it would be inconvenient on their part. People who are living in busy cities often value their time very much. Rather than walking or biking, they prefer to use their own private vehicles to save time. Implementing these measures would take time but the moment that people get used to the idea, they would slowly open up and accept these methods. Anyhow, that is my opinon in relation to this matter. I hope you\'re having a good day. See you again on Thursday. ^^ ~Teacher C[이름] Forcing people to walk, bike or use public-transportation is a good idea on the one side. >> Forcing people to walk, bike or use public-transportation is a good idea on one side. It could be helpful to reduce the air pollution of the city. >> CORRECT! OR >> It would be useful in decreasing the air pollution in the city. When I was a kid, I thought It was a fantastic idea. >> When I was a kid, I thought it was a fantastic idea. As I grow up, I find that it is not easy to solve it. >> As I grew up, I found out that it is not easy to solve it. First, the city is big and many people live in there. >> CORRECT! OR >> First of all, the city is large and full of people. They have to work everyday and they want to live close the office. >> They have to work everyday and they want to live close to the office. It\'s because of the convenience. >> CORRECT! OR >> It\'s because it\'s very convenient for the people. Everybody wants to conveniently commute. >> CORRECT! OR >> Everybody wants to commute easily. But if the city is big, we have to move a large distance for commuting. >> But if the city is big, we have to move from a longer distance for commuting. I think this idea is good for small city. >> I think this idea is good for a small city. To be adjusted this idea into the city, a lot of conditions have to be satisfied. >> For a city to be able to adjust to this idea, a lot of conditions have to be satisfied. I think the conditions are a small city, a good public-transportation system and a good bike road system. >> [DO YOU MEAN]: I think these conditions are applicable in a small city where there is a good public-transportation system and a good bike road system. Of course, there would be many things. >> CORRECT! OR >> Of course, many things are needed. And then, if you are recommended to use something to reduce the air pollution, we could merrily use it or participate in reducing the pollution. >> CORRECT! OR >> After that, if you are recommended of a way to reduce air pollution and do it, we could help decrease pollution. To safe the earth, we have to reduce the pollution. >> To save the earth, we have to reduce the pollution.

파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.

다른 영어첨삭교정 보기

영어첨삭교정 ·