Do powerful countries have the right to use military force in other countries if they claim it is fo
학생이 쓴 원문
Recently, United States sent troops to Venezuela to repatriate Nicolas Maduro, ex-president. The reason was to charge him and his wife with narco-terrorism, corruption, drug trafficking and so on. This act drew controversies on US allies and adversaries as Mr. [Name] was president of the sovereign nation. This action can bring various threats to global order. First, it can provide bad precedents for other nations. US rationale behind this action was the capturing criminals and taking him to the court and dismissing any allegation of military action. This can justify other nations to take similar action. For example, Mr. [Name] can abduct Mr. [Name] and China can do same. Secondly, this can accelerate US adversaries to put more investment on their military facilities. Even though Venezuela government was expecting the attack, they surrendered in few hours. Accordingly other adversaries will be prepared for more potent machinery such as nuclear power.
강사 첨삭
Thank you for this, Aciel! Good luck there today.
Recently, United States sent troops to Venezuela to repatriate Nicolas Maduro, ex-president.
>>> Recently, the United States sent troops to Venezuela to capture Nicolas Maduro, the country\'s ex-president.
>>> OR: Recently, the United States carried out a military operation in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of Nicolás Maduro, the former president, and his wife.
The reason was to charge him and his wife with narco-terrorism, corruption, drug trafficking and so on.
>>> OR: The U.S. government said the operation aimed to bring them to justice on charges including narco‑terrorism, corruption, and drug trafficking
This act drew controversies on US allies and adversaries as Mr. [Name] was president of the sovereign nation.
>>> OR: However, this action sparked widespread controversy among both U.S. allies and adversaries because Maduro was the leader of a sovereign nation at the time of the operation.
This action can bring various threats to global order.
>>> correct
>>> OR: Critics argue that this intervention poses serious threats to the global order.
First, it can provide bad precedents for other nations. US rationale behind this action was the capturing criminals and taking him to the court and dismissing any allegation of military action. This can justify other nations to take similar action.
>>> First, it sets a dangerous precedent: although the U.S. justified its actions as capturing criminals and denied any intent of broader military occupation, other powers might use similar reasoning to justify their own interventions.
For example, Mr. [Name] can abduct Mr. [Name] and China can do same.
>>> For example, some fear leaders like Vladimir Putin could abduct Ukraine’s president, and China could act against its rivals under pretexts of law enforcement.
Secondly, this can accelerate US adversaries to put more investment on their military facilities.
>>> correct
Even though Venezuela government was expecting the attack, they surrendered in few hours.
>>> correct
Accordingly, other adversaries will be prepared for more potent machinery such as nuclear power.
>>> correct
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.