Do you think famous artworks are always better than lesser-known ones?
학생이 쓴 원문
I don\'t think famous artworks are better than lesser-known ones. Of course, if an art work is famous, the artist get attention from people and earn a lot of money. However, it\'s difficult to evaluate a worth of artwork. It depends on person who evaluate the artwork, and all evaluation might be different. Furthermore, I think object of artworks is not to be famous. The goal of artwork is to express someone\'s inner space.
강사 첨삭
Hi, Mary! You did a great job expressing your ideas and explaining why fame doesn’t always determine the value of an artwork. I like how you emphasized that the purpose of art is to express the artist’s inner world, not just to gain attention or money. To make your writing even stronger, focus on small grammar points like subject-verb agreement (“artist gets” instead of “artist get”) and using precise expressions (“the purpose of an artwork” instead of “object of artworks”). Overall, your ideas are thoughtful and well-organized. Keep practicing, your writing is becoming more clear and expressive!
-Teacher Wela
Of course, if an art work is famous, the artist get attention from people and earn a lot of money.
>> Of course, if an artwork is famous, the artist gets attention from people and earns a lot of money.
However, it\'s difficult to evaluate a worth of artwork.
>> However, it is difficult to evaluate the worth of an artwork.
It depends on person who evaluate the artwork, and all evaluation might be different.
>> It depends on the person who evaluates the artwork, and everyone’s evaluation might be different.
Furthermore, I think object of artworks is not to be famous.
>> Furthermore, I think the purpose of an artwork is not to become famous.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.