Do you think today’s actors are better than those from 30, 40, or 50 years ago? Why or why not?
학생이 쓴 원문
I think today\'s actors are similar to ancient actors.
Of course, today\'s knowledge and lectures are more plentiful than ancient.
However, ancient painters are as excellent as today\'s painters, though today\'s skill and analysis methods are improved.
I think a great actor is one who expresses their emotions clearly.
There were that kind of people, I don\'t talk about which time is better.
강사 첨삭
Hi, MK!
I agree! Most of the time, we tend to focus on the talent of the actors rather than their age or generation. I also agree that current technology and facilities have given actors and actresses the opportunity to improve their craft.
- T. Caitlyn
- T. Caitlyn
I think today\'s actors are similar to ancient actors.
>> CORRECT
Of course, today\'s knowledge and lectures are more plentiful than ancient.
Of course, today\'s knowledge and lectures are more plentiful than ancient.
>> Of course, today\'s knowledge and lectures are more plentiful than those of ancient times.
However, ancient painters are as excellent as today\'s painters, though today\'s skill and analysis methods are improved.
However, ancient painters are as excellent as today\'s painters, though today\'s skill and analysis methods are improved.
>> However, ancient painters were as excellent as today’s painters, though today’s skills and analytical methods have improved.
I think a great actor is one who expresses their emotions clearly.
I think a great actor is one who expresses their emotions clearly.
>> CORRECT
There were that kind of people, I don\'t talk about which time is better.
There were that kind of people, I don\'t talk about which time is better.
>> Such people existed in both times; I\'m not commenting on which era is better.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.