Homework

Hello, teacher. I can't imagine that I sing for two hours. I guess your energy and fervor toward singing is great. Anyway, below is the last part of my presentation. Firstly, is there any way to eliminate hate speech in public sphere except through law? I sympathize with the idea that freedom of hatred is not desirable, but ban on hate speech by law looks like wiping up the blood without wound treatment. Next, Parekh mentions various features, which can be a target of attack, such as race, ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, and sexual orientation. These are in general ascriptive features or the features that we cannot arbitrarily change. If so, what should we think of the case as follows? Internet users find out the executive at a major company, who was being too bossy(갑질) to a stewardess. And then, they start to attempt character assassination about him. According to Parekh's criteria, this is not a case of hate speech because they doesn't incite to action.

Hi Kaylee! I was just kidding. I didn\'t sing for two hours. Haha! My mother caught a cold and I think, like her clothes and shoes, she passed on the virus to me. Anyway, I\'ll be fine. Thank you for your concern. Ciao! ~Teacher Marie~ Hello, teacher. >> CORRECT! I can\'t imagine that I sing for two hours. >> I can\'t imagine singing for two hours. I guess your energy and fervor toward singing is great. >> I guess you were singing with great enthusiasm. Anyway, below is the last part of my presentation. >> CORRECT! Firstly, is there any way to eliminate hate speech in public sphere except through law? >> CORRECT! I sympathize with the idea that freedom of hatred is not desirable, but ban on hate speech by law looks like wiping up the blood without wound treatment. >> I sympathize with the idea that freedom of hatred is not desirable, but the ban on hate speech by law looks like wiping up the blood without treating the wound. Next, Parekh mentions various features, which can be a target of attack, such as race, ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, and sexual orientation.>> CORRECT! These are in general ascriptive features or the features that we cannot arbitrarily change. >> These are, generally, ascriptive features or the features that we cannot arbitrarily change. If so, what should we think of the case as follows? >> CORRECT! Internet users find out the executive at a major company, who was being too bossy(갑질) to a stewardess. >> Internet users found out about the executive of a top company, who was being too bossy(갑질) to a stewardess. And then, they start to attempt character assassination about him. >> And then they started to talk about an attempt to assassinate him.According to Parekh\'s criteria, this is not a case of hate speech because they doesn\'t incite to action. >> According to Parekh\'s criteria, this is not a case of hate speech because they didn\'t incite an action.