How can courts decide what is true when events happened many years ago?
학생이 쓴 원문
Like Epstein cases which had its’ oldest case of 30 years old, it is extremely difficult to verify the cases that happened many years ago. The most important one would be contemporaneous evidence which was made near the time of event. Such evidence can include emails, letters, diaries, official records. It is also preferential if this evidence can show the incident in chronological order. Many of Epstein victims got hold of message or email exchanged with either Epstein or Maxwell. Some victims brought the photos and others submitted clothes and accessories bought by criminals as part of the compensation. Then there come with witness testimony. Accuracy and consistency matter with these testimonies because oral accounts for old cases are sometimes accused of its bias and exaggeration which can corroborate other evidence. Epstein and Maxwell attorneys challenged the oral evidence as if it has been overly exaggerated by trauma and memory lapse.
강사 첨삭
Thank you for this once again, Aciel!
Like Epstein cases which had its’ oldest case of 30 years old, it is extremely difficult to verify the cases that happened many years ago.
>>> For cases like the Epstein case, where some incidents date back more than 30 years, it is extremely difficult to verify events that happened long ago.
The most important one would be contemporaneous evidence which was made near the time of event.
>>> The most important form of proof is contemporaneous evidence, which is created close to the time of the event.
Such evidence can include emails, letters, diaries, official records.
>>> correct
It is also preferential if this evidence can show the incident in chronological order.
>>> It is also preferable for this evidence to show the incident in chronological order.
Many of Epstein victims got hold of message or email exchanged with either Epstein or Maxwell.
>>> Many of Epstein’s victims were able to provide messages or emails exchanged with either Epstein or Maxwell.
Some victims brought the photos and others submitted clothes and accessories bought by criminals as part of the compensation.
>>> correct
>>> OR: Some victims submitted photographs, while others presented clothing and accessories purchased by the perpetrators as part of their claims for compensation.
Then there come with witness testimony.
>>> Then there comes witness testimonies.
>>> OR: Witness testimony also plays an important role.
Accuracy and consistency matter with these testimonies because oral accounts for old cases are sometimes accused of its bias and exaggeration which can corroborate other evidence.
>>> However, the accuracy and consistency of these testimonies matter greatly, as oral accounts in older cases are often accused of bias or exaggeration. These testimonies are usually used to corroborate other evidence.
Epstein and Maxwell attorneys challenged the oral evidence as if it has been overly exaggerated by trauma and memory lapse.
>>> OR: Epstein’s and Maxwell’s attorneys challenged the oral evidence, arguing that it had been exaggerated due to trauma and memory lapse.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.