How much do you agree that there is one law for the rich and another for the poor?
학생이 쓴 원문
강사 첨삭
I think there is one law for the rich and the poor but there are many subdivision in the texts and many interpretations according to the situation of a man sentenced.
>> Correct
So we can sentence different penalties with a same text.
>> So, we can sentence different penalties with the same text.
But I rather agree that there are discrimination or outdated attitude in interpretation the text in application of law.
>> But I would rather agree that there are discrimination or outdated attitude in interpreting the text in the application of the law.
Since we have kept the system to permit to reduce penalties with bail or defend of qualified attorney, the rich could have more possibility to be free or to reduce a sentence. The corruption is also one of the way of escape from the sentence.
>> Since we have kept the system to permit to reduce penalties with bail or be defended by qualified attorneys, the rich have more possibilities to be free or to have a reduced sentence. The corruption is also one way to escape from the sentence.
The system of justice is too complicated to be solved by one actor.
>> Correct
The jugement can be biased by many interests or by personnal view.
>> The judgement can be biased by many interests or by personal view.
In the conclusion, I agree 80 percent that we have one law for the rich and another for the poor.
>> In conclusion, I agree 80 percent that we have one law for the rich and another for the poor.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.