Second compostion 2; Comparing two items
학생이 쓴 원문
강사 첨삭
Hello there! This information is very helpful. Now, I can save money from my electric bill. Thank you so much. See you in class!
--Teacher Chloe
(I always appriciate your great feedback. Thank you so much.)
>> Correct
>> ***appreciate
First, I will talk about the electric consumption.
>> First, I
will talk about electric consumptions.
Assuming the two types of lamps have same brightness, the consumption of LED lamps is about five times less than Fluorescent lamps.
>>
Assuming the two types of lamp have the same brightness, the consumption of LED lamps is about five times lesser than Fluorescent lamps.
Because the consumption is directly proportional to the electric bill, if we use LED lamps, then we can save our five times money.
>>
Because the consumption is directly proportional to the electric bill, if we use LED lamps, then we can save our
money
five times .
Next, I’m going to tell you about their lifespan.
>> Correct
The lifespan of fluorescent lamps like those (pointing the lamps of ceiling) is 10,000 hours.
>> Correct
It’s about 3 years if we use it 10 hours a day. On the contrary, LED lamps can last 60,000 hours.
>>
It\'s equivalent to 3 years if we use it for 10 hours a day. On the contrary, LED lamps can last for 60,000 hours.
Yes LED lamps have six times more lifespan than fluorescent lamps.
>>
Yes LED lamps lifespan is six times longer than fluorescent lamps.
Until now, we can see LED lamps are still better than fluorescent lamps.
>> Now, we can say that LED lamps are far better than
fluorescent lamps.
Nevertheless we still use more fluorescent lamps.
>>
Nevertheless most of us still use fluorescent lamps.
The answer is in next. Let’s see.
>> The answer is on the next composition. Let\'s see.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.