Should countries actively promote tourism between them as a way to improve relations, or should tour
학생이 쓴 원문
Travel should be strictly separated from politics. However, many governments are utilising travel as a bargaining chip. Governments impose travel bans or stricter visa regulations on adversaries. On the other hand, they lift visa requirements to reinforce the relationship. In most cases, these strategies bring two impacts. First, it can harm the economies of other nations, such as China and Japan. Alongside this, it has a psychological effect of stirring public feelings, which is why I oppose politics intervening in commercial travel. When the government stops or promotes tourism, they bring up reasons that have a negative impact on opposing nations. Citizens blame opposing nations when there are stricter travel regulations, and after the travel ban is lifted, they still harbour negative feelings, viewing it as a convenience for people from other countries. For example, when the Korean government lifted visa restrictions on Chinese travellers, there was widespread controversy.
강사 첨삭
Thank you for this as well, Aciel!
Travel should be strictly separated from politics.
>>> correct
However, many governments are utilizing travel as a bargaining chip. >>> correct
Governments impose travel bans or stricter visa regulations on adversaries.
>>> correct
>>> OR: They impose travel bans or stricter visa regulations on adversaries, while lifting visa requirements to strengthen relationships.
On the other hand, they lift visa requirements to reinforce the relationship.
>>> correct
In most cases, these strategies bring two impacts.
>>> correct
First, it can harm the economies of other nations, such as China and Japan.
>>> correct
Alongside this, it has a psychological effect of stirring public feelings, which is why I oppose politics intervening in commercial travel.
>>> correct
>>> OR: In addition, they can have a psychological effect by stirring public sentiment, which is why I oppose politics intervening in commercial travel.
When the government stops or promotes tourism, they bring up reasons that have a negative impact on opposing nations.
>>> OR: When governments restrict or promote tourism, they often present reasons that negatively affect opposing nations.
Citizens blame opposing nations when there are stricter travel regulations, and after the travel ban is lifted, they still harbour negative feelings, viewing it as a convenience for people from other countries.
>>> OR: Citizens may blame those nations when stricter travel regulations are imposed, and even after the restrictions are lifted, they may still harbor negative feelings, seeing it as merely a convenience for people from other countries.
For example, when the Korean government lifted visa restrictions on Chinese travelers, there was widespread controversy.
>>> correct
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.