Should the government handle the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine and should it be free?

2020-10-30 · 첨삭 강사 Jean

학생이 쓴 원문

As soon as phase III medical trial is finished and get approved as a completely harmless vaccine for human beings, it starts manufacturing. And most experts assume that the vaccine will be available in the middle of 2021. In terms of its cost, someone said that manufacturing speed was not fast enough to distribute everyone in the world at the same time, so only the affordable people are managed to get it at the right timing. And I can say that pharmaceutical companies which succeeded to manufacture their vaccine want to make profits more than the money they have spent on testing, so the bottom quintile of income may not be able to buy it. To prevent the disproportionate distribution of the vaccine, I think the government has to set a distribution order, priority-assessment system: emergency should be the first, age would be the second, and income might be the third. And a vulnerable group of people like the elder and children needs to hand out at free until being immune to the virus.

강사 첨삭

Here\'s your corrected homework, [이름]!

Cheers,
Jean~~

As soon as phase III medical trial is finished and get approved as a completely harmless vaccine for human beings, it starts manufacturing. And most experts assume that the vaccine will be available in the middle of 2021.
>> As soon as phase III clinical trial is finished wherein the vaccine is tested for efficacy and safety, it would undergo phase IV at which point, the said medicine is approved and licensed. 

In terms of its cost, someone said that manufacturing speed was not fast enough to distribute everyone in the world at the same time, so only the affordable people are managed to get it at the right timing. And I can say that pharmaceutical companies which succeeded to manufacture their vaccine want to make profits more than the money they have spent on testing, so the bottom quintile of income may not be able to buy it.
>> Some people theorize that it\'s not feasible to manufacture enough vaccines that can be dispensed to the global population at the same time, consequently, only those who can afford the price would be able to get their hands on such item which is expected to be in great demand.  

And I can say that pharmaceutical companies which succeeded to manufacture their vaccine want to make profits more than the money they have spent on testing, so the bottom quintile of income may not be able to buy it.
>> In line with this argument, I can say that pharmaceutical companies that succeeded in producing their vaccines would want to earn profits and those who belong to the lower-income households would be the ones to suffer. 

To prevent the disproportionate distribution of the vaccine, I think the government has to set a distribution order, priority-assessment system: emergency should be the first, age would be the second, and income might be the third. And a vulnerable group of people like the elder and children needs to hand out at free until being immune to the virus.
>> To prevent the disproportionate dispensation of this long-awaited drug, as I see it, the government has to set a distribution order, priority-assessment system, i.e., emergency cases should be given priority, age would be the second, and income might be the third. The allotment of free vaccine to the vulnerable and high risk groups, such as the elderly and children should run concurrent with the aforementioned criteria. 


파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.

다른 영어첨삭교정 보기

영어첨삭교정 ·