what do you think of anarchism

the book I read show Anarchism aims for a classless society but rejects a strong controlling state. they fights with government for abolishing a hierarchical organization. it does not argue to complete disorder but just advocates a emense? freedom. anarchism want to live in a non-hierarchical world where each people would have independent life. But, I think it is so ideal and If it will be realized, the problems are always occur anywhere. finally, they won't have interrelatives and then we are exstinct. So in my opinion the Anarchism is not a proper thing. how about karla? and then I have a question. what is the difference between "What do you think~" and "how do you think~"

Hi [이름]! Wow! Your composition talks about a very serious topic. I really think that your English ability is very distinct and you discuss amazing matters. Good job! I wasn't even sure of what "Anarchism" means. I had to look it up on the internet. Haha. And I actually agree with you, anarchism is not proper. It promotes too much individuality which erases unity. The difference between "what do you think" and "how do you think" >>"what do you think" usually asks for you opinion on an idea. This question is usually answered with a simple statement of your opinion. example: Question: What do you think about anarchism?                Answer: I think it is a terrible thing. >>"how do you think" is almost the same as " what do you think" but, it is a type of question that asks for deeper details in order to answer the question "how". It is usually answered with methods,  procedure or techniques. example: Question: How do you think can we understand anarchism?               Answer: We can start by knowing the definition of anarchism, and then we can study the different concepts in anarchism. Karla the book I read show Anarchism aims for a classless society but rejects a strong controlling state. >>The book I read showed that Anarchism aims for a classless society but rejects a strong controlling state. >>OTHER:The book I read was about Anarchism which aims for a classless society and rejects a strongly controlled state. they fights with government for abolishing a hierarchical organization. >>They fight with government for abolishing a hierarchical organization. >>OTHER:Anarcy fights with the government in order to abolish hierarchical organization. it does not argue to complete disorder but just advocates a emense? freedom. >>It does not argue to complete disorder but just advocates immense freedom. >>OTHER:It does not imply total disorder but just supports immeasurable freedom anarchism want to live in a non-hierarchical world where each people would have independent life. >>Anarchism wants people to live in a non-hierarchical world where each person would have independent lives. >>OTHER:Anarchism wants the mass to exist in a non-hierarchical world where everyone would lead independents lives. But, I think it is so ideal and If it will be realized, the problems are always occur anywhere. >>But, I think it is so ideal and if it will be realized, the problems always occur anywhere.  >>OTHER:But I think it is so ideal and if it will be accomplished, problems will be everywhere. finally, they won't have interrelatives and then we are exstinct. >>Finally, they won't have relatives and then we will be extinct. >>OTHER:Finally, they won't have descendants and then we will be extinct. So in my opinion the Anarchism is not a proper thing. >>CORRECT how about karla?>>CORRECTand then I have a question. >>CORRECT what is the difference between "What do you think~" and "how do you think~" >>CORRECT