What’s worse: losing something you borrowed or having someone break something you lent? Why?

You clearly explained the consequences of losing or breaking borrowed items and connected it to trust, which is excellent reasoning. To improve, focus on verb tenses, word choice (lend/lender, properly), and sentence flow. Overall, thoughtful and practical answer, very good!

-Teacher Wela 

I think they are same situation.

>> I think they are the same situation.

If someone broke or lost borrowed item, it can\'t be returned on original state anymore.

>> If someone breaks or loses a borrowed item, it cannot be returned to its original state.

And I think if I do that, I have to compensate for the same value as my borrowed goods.

>> I also think that if I did that, I would have to compensate for the full value of the borrowed item.

Because if someone doesn\'t compensate for the lost goods, the trust between the borrower and lenter will broken and relationship can be worse.

>> If someone does not compensate for lost goods, the trust between the borrower and lender will be broken, and the relationship can deteriorate.

Therefore, if you want to borrow or lent something, you have to consider that it must be returned rightly.

>> Therefore, if you want to borrow or lend something, you must ensure that it will be returned properly.