Why do cases involving political figures often become highly sensitive?
학생이 쓴 원문
Politics has become highly polarised lately, regardless of nations. When a story about a prominent political figure breaks, the public weighs the pros and cons. It feels like this trend has been exacerbated lately, which is why cases involving political figures are highly sensitive. There are two reasons. First, people have a high emotional stake in politics. People experience personal emotions regarding politics, and legal tactics against political figures are often perceived by supporters as attacks on their personal values. This trend is prevalent in Korea, where people idolise politicians. Alongside this, political weaponisation is becoming more prevalent. Political weaponisation is the strategy of using institutions, information, or social issues to gain political advantage. Such tactics often lead to accusations that the legal process is being used as a weapon to damage political opponents, which, in turn, causes a deep legitimacy crisis, whether the allegations are true or not.
강사 첨삭
Thank you for this Aciel!
Politics has become highly polarised lately, regardless of nations.
>>> correct
>> OR: Politics has become highly polarized lately, regardless of nations.
When a story about a prominent political figure breaks, the public weighs the pros and cons. >>> correct
>>> OR: When a story about a prominent political figure breaks, the public tends to weigh the pros and cons.
It feels like this trend has been exacerbated lately, which is why cases involving political figures are highly sensitive.
>>> correct
>>> OR: It feels like this trend has intensified in recent years, which is why cases involving political figures are highly sensitive.
There are two reasons.
>>> correct
>>> OR: There are two main reasons for this.
First, people have a high emotional stake in politics.
>>> correct
People experience personal emotions regarding politics, and legal tactics against political figures are often perceived by supporters as attacks on their personal values.
>>> OR: They often form personal attachments, and legal actions against political figures are frequently perceived by supporters as attacks on their own values.
This trend is prevalent in Korea, where people idolise/idolize politicians.
>>> correct
Alongside this, political weaponization is becoming more prevalent.
>>> correct
Political weaponisation is the strategy of using institutions, information, or social issues to gain political advantage.
>>> correct
Such tactics often lead to accusations that the legal process is being used as a weapon to damage political opponents, which, in turn, causes a deep legitimacy crisis, whether the allegations are true or not.
>>> correct.
>>> OR: Such tactics often lead to accusations that the legal process is being used as a weapon to damage political opponents. In turn, this creates a deep crisis of legitimacy, whether the allegations are true or not.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.