해석 두번째입니다.

After detailed and systematic study, Lorenzo decided that Continental had excessive overhead expenses, much of it attributable to high labor costs. At the time, labor costs for U.S.-based airlines were between 15 and 20 percent higher than those for major international co,petitors. If Continental was to succeed, Lorenzo reasoned, labor costs had to come down. 복잡하고 체계적인 연구를 한다음에, Lorenzo는 대부분이 높은 고용비인 과도한 간접비용을 가지기로 결정했다. 그당시 U.S에 기초한 항공사의 고용비(노동비)는 소수의(몇몇의)국제적인 경쟁사보다 15~20%정도 높았다. 만약 Lorenzo의 주장대로 Continental이 성공했다면 고용비(노동비)는 줄어야했다. 해석 확인 부탁드려요^^

Hello there [이름]!! A pleasant day to you. Similar to the first one, there are some characters that I really cannot read so I just checked those that are readable. ^^ Anyway, if you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. Have a great day! T.Kristel After detailed and systematic study, Lorenzo decided that Continental had excessive overhead expenses, much of it attributable to high labor costs. >>  After a detailed and systematic study, Lorenzo decided that Continental had excessive overhead expenses and much of it is attributed to high labor costs. At the time, labor costs for U.S.-based airlines were between 15 and 20 percent higher than those for major international co,petitors.>> At that time, labor costs for U.S.-based airlines were between 15 and 20 percent higher than those of major international competitors.  If Continental was to succeed, Lorenzo reasoned, labor costs had to come down. >> If Continental would succeed, Lorenzo reasoned, the labor cost would go down.복잡하고 체계적인 연구를 한다음에, Lorenzo는 대부분이 높은 고용비인 과도한 간접비용을 가지기로 결정했다. 그당시 U.S에 기초한 항공사의 고용비(노동비)는 소수의(몇몇의)국제적인 경쟁사보다 15~20%정도 높았다. 만약 Lorenzo의 주장대로 Continental이 성공했다면 고용비(노동비)는 줄어야했다.해석 확인 부탁드려요^^